Scribbl and Speakr are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Scribbl: Chrome extension that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings without sending a bot into the call. Speakr: Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Scribbl when taking bot-free notes during google meet calls matters most, and Speakr when privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search.
Configurable AI models compatible with OpenAI, OpenRouter, and local models
Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks
Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard
Scribbl is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Chrome extension that records and transcribes meetings
Self-hosted transcription with automatic language detection
Standout feature
Bot-free capture directly through the browser
Optional AI-powered speaker diarization
Team usage
AI summaries with key points and action items
Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks
Integrations
Searchable combination of video, transcript, and notes
Per-recording chat and an Inquire Mode for semantic search across the whole library
Languages & capture
Support for many transcription languages
System and browser-tab audio capture
Best-fit workflow
Chrome extension that records and transcribes meetings
Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard
Best for
Scribbl
Choose Scribbl if you need taking bot-free notes during google meet calls — strengths include captures meetings without adding a visible bot participant.
Speakr
Choose Speakr if you need privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings — strengths include runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control.
Pros & cons
Scribbl
+ Captures meetings without adding a visible bot participant
+ Lightweight setup as a browser extension
- Primary support centered on Google Meet, with other platforms still expanding
Speakr
+ Runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control
+ Action-item extraction and per-recording chat go beyond plain transcripts
- Current releases are alpha-stage and may not be production-stable
FAQ
Is Scribbl or Speakr better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Scribbl is strong for taking bot-free notes during google meet calls, while Speakr is strong for privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Scribbl and Speakr compare on price?
Scribbl is a free tier with paid upgrades and Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Scribbl and Speakr?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.
Scribbl vs Speakr: Pricing, Features & Recommendation | Hosiqo