Scribbl and Scriberr are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Scribbl: Chrome extension that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings without sending a bot into the call. Scriberr: Open-source, self-hosted AI audio transcription app that runs Whisper models locally with speaker diarization, summaries, and chat-with-transcript. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Scribbl when taking bot-free notes during google meet calls matters most, and Scriberr when privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Scribbl is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Scriberr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Chrome extension that records and transcribes meetings
Local, offline transcription using Whisper models via the WhisperX engine
Standout feature
Bot-free capture directly through the browser
Automatic speaker diarization (who said what)
Team usage
AI summaries with key points and action items
AI summaries with custom prompts via Ollama or OpenAI-compatible providers
Integrations
Searchable combination of video, transcript, and notes
Chat with your transcripts to ask questions and pull insights
Languages & capture
Support for many transcription languages
Built-in audio recorder and note-taking on transcripts
Best-fit workflow
Chrome extension that records and transcribes meetings
Folder watcher and API endpoints for automation workflows
Best for
Scribbl
Choose Scribbl if you need taking bot-free notes during google meet calls — strengths include captures meetings without adding a visible bot participant.
Scriberr
Choose Scriberr if you need privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure — strengths include fully self-hosted and offline, keeping audio and transcripts on your own hardware.
Pros & cons
Scribbl
+ Captures meetings without adding a visible bot participant
+ Lightweight setup as a browser extension
- Primary support centered on Google Meet, with other platforms still expanding
Scriberr
+ Fully self-hosted and offline, keeping audio and transcripts on your own hardware
+ MIT-licensed and free to run with no per-minute charges
- Active development was publicly paused by the maintainer, relying on community contributions
FAQ
Is Scribbl or Scriberr better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Scribbl is strong for taking bot-free notes during google meet calls, while Scriberr is strong for privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Scribbl and Scriberr compare on price?
Scribbl is a free tier with paid upgrades and Scriberr is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Scribbl and Scriberr?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.
Scribbl vs Scriberr: Pricing, Features & Recommendation | Hosiqo