Scrib and Tana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Scrib: India-built AI transcription tool for 22 Indian languages plus global languages, with speaker labels, summaries, and meeting-bot capture for Zoom, Meet, and Teams. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Scrib when transcribing multilingual or hinglish team meetings captured live or via the zoom/meet/teams bot matters most, and Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
India-built AI transcription tool for 22 Indian languages plus global languages, with speaker labels, summaries, and meeting-bot capture for Zoom, Meet, and Teams.
AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base.
Scrib is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Scrib | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Transcription across 22 Indian languages plus 19 global languages, with Hindi-English code-switching support | Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio |
| Standout feature | Multiple capture methods: file upload, live microphone recording, link pasting (YouTube, Loom, Drive, Dropbox), and a meeting bot | Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings |
| Team usage | Meeting bot that joins Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams to transcribe calls automatically | Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace |
| Integrations | Automatic speaker recognition with per-speaker labels and timelines | Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects |
| Languages & capture | AI-generated summaries, chapters, key insights, and action items | Automatic meeting detection on Mac |
| Best-fit workflow | Inline transcript editing with click-to-seek playback | 60+ language support with automatic detection |
Scrib
Choose Scrib if you need transcribing multilingual or hinglish team meetings captured live or via the zoom/meet/teams bot — strengths include strong coverage of indian languages and hinglish code-switching that many global tools handle less reliably.
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
Scrib
Tana
It depends on your workflow. Scrib is strong for transcribing multilingual or hinglish team meetings captured live or via the zoom/meet/teams bot, while Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Scrib is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.