Screenpipe and Scriberr are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Screenpipe: Screenpipe is an open, local-first desktop app that records your screen and audio, transcribes calls on-device with Whisper, and auto-generates meeting summaries with action items. Scriberr: Open-source, self-hosted AI audio transcription app that runs Whisper models locally with speaker diarization, summaries, and chat-with-transcript. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Screenpipe when automatically capturing and summarizing video calls across zoom, meet, and teams without a meeting bot matters most, and Scriberr when privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Screenpipe is an open, local-first desktop app that records your screen and audio, transcribes calls on-device with Whisper, and auto-generates meeting summaries with action items.
Automatic meeting summaries with bullet recap, action items per person, and decisions plus next stepsFully offline operation with local storage, on-device PII redaction, and app/window/URL exclusionsLocal real-time transcription using OpenAI's Whisper model, with speaker diarization and multi-language support
Screenpipe vs Scriberr: Pricing, Features & Recommendation | Hosiqo
Custom
AI Meeting Assistants
Open-source, self-hosted AI audio transcription app that runs Whisper models locally with speaker diarization, summaries, and chat-with-transcript.
AI summaries with custom prompts via Ollama or OpenAI-compatible providersAutomatic speaker diarization (who said what)Built-in audio recorder and note-taking on transcripts
Screenpipe is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Scriberr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
On-device screen and audio recording that captures system audio from any app, including Zoom, Google Meet, Teams, and Slack huddles
Local, offline transcription using Whisper models via the WhisperX engine
Standout feature
Local real-time transcription using OpenAI's Whisper model, with speaker diarization and multi-language support
Automatic speaker diarization (who said what)
Team usage
Automatic meeting summaries with bullet recap, action items per person, and decisions plus next steps
AI summaries with custom prompts via Ollama or OpenAI-compatible providers
Integrations
Writes structured notes to destinations like Obsidian, Notion, and Apple Notes via configurable pipes
Chat with your transcripts to ask questions and pull insights
Languages & capture
Fully offline operation with local storage, on-device PII redaction, and app/window/URL exclusions
Built-in audio recorder and note-taking on transcripts
Best-fit workflow
Runs as an MCP server so AI assistants and clients can query your screen and audio history
Folder watcher and API endpoints for automation workflows
Best for
Screenpipe
Choose Screenpipe if you need automatically capturing and summarizing video calls across zoom, meet, and teams without a meeting bot — strengths include privacy-first: capture, transcription, and search can run entirely on-device with no cloud dependency.
Scriberr
Choose Scriberr if you need privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure — strengths include fully self-hosted and offline, keeping audio and transcripts on your own hardware.
Pros & cons
Screenpipe
+ Privacy-first: capture, transcription, and search can run entirely on-device with no cloud dependency
+ Open and source-available with an actively maintained codebase you can audit and self-host
- Continuous 24/7 screen and audio recording is resource-intensive and can feel heavyweight for users who only want meeting notes
Scriberr
+ Fully self-hosted and offline, keeping audio and transcripts on your own hardware
+ MIT-licensed and free to run with no per-minute charges
- Active development was publicly paused by the maintainer, relying on community contributions
FAQ
Is Screenpipe or Scriberr better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Screenpipe is strong for automatically capturing and summarizing video calls across zoom, meet, and teams without a meeting bot, while Scriberr is strong for privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Screenpipe and Scriberr compare on price?
Screenpipe is a free tier with paid upgrades and Scriberr is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Screenpipe and Scriberr?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.