ScreenApp and Typist are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. ScreenApp: AI screen and meeting recorder that captures video and audio, then transcribes and summarizes the content automatically. Typist: AI speech-to-text service that converts audio and video into text and exports captions, with tiered models for speed or accuracy. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription workflows, shortlist ScreenApp when recording and transcribing webinars matters most, and Typist when transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
ScreenApp is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Typist is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Audio and video to text transcription across many file formats
Standout feature
Automatic transcription
Export to SRT subtitles, WebVTT captions, DOCX, PDF, and TXT
Team usage
AI summaries and notes
Multiple transcription models trading off speed and accuracy
Integrations
Searchable recordings
Speaker identification on the highest-accuracy tier
Languages & capture
Sharing and export
Word-level and segment-level timestamps for clean subtitle timing
Best-fit workflow
Screen and meeting recording
Support for a wide range of languages and accents
Best for
ScreenApp
Choose ScreenApp if you need recording and transcribing webinars — strengths include flexible recording beyond meetings.
Typist
Choose Typist if you need transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls — strengths include clean subtitle exports (srt and webvtt) that import into video editors.
Pros & cons
ScreenApp
+ Flexible recording beyond meetings
+ Turns any recording into searchable notes
- Broad scope rather than meeting-specialized
Typist
+ Clean subtitle exports (SRT and WebVTT) that import into video editors
+ Choice of models lets users prioritize speed or accuracy per job
- Speaker identification is limited to the top tier
FAQ
Is ScreenApp or Typist better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. ScreenApp is strong for recording and transcribing webinars, while Typist is strong for transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do ScreenApp and Typist compare on price?
ScreenApp is a free tier with paid upgrades and Typist is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both ScreenApp and Typist?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.