ScreenApp and Speakr are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. ScreenApp: AI screen and meeting recorder that captures video and audio, then transcribes and summarizes the content automatically. Speakr: Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist ScreenApp when recording and transcribing webinars matters most, and Speakr when privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search.
Configurable AI models compatible with OpenAI, OpenRouter, and local models
Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks
Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard
ScreenApp is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Self-hosted transcription with automatic language detection
Standout feature
Automatic transcription
Optional AI-powered speaker diarization
Team usage
AI summaries and notes
Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks
Integrations
Searchable recordings
Per-recording chat and an Inquire Mode for semantic search across the whole library
Languages & capture
Sharing and export
System and browser-tab audio capture
Best-fit workflow
Screen and meeting recording
Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard
Best for
ScreenApp
Choose ScreenApp if you need recording and transcribing webinars — strengths include flexible recording beyond meetings.
Speakr
Choose Speakr if you need privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings — strengths include runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control.
Pros & cons
ScreenApp
+ Flexible recording beyond meetings
+ Turns any recording into searchable notes
- Broad scope rather than meeting-specialized
Speakr
+ Runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control
+ Action-item extraction and per-recording chat go beyond plain transcripts
- Current releases are alpha-stage and may not be production-stable
FAQ
Is ScreenApp or Speakr better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. ScreenApp is strong for recording and transcribing webinars, while Speakr is strong for privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do ScreenApp and Speakr compare on price?
ScreenApp is a free tier with paid upgrades and Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both ScreenApp and Speakr?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.