ScreenApp and Scriberr are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. ScreenApp: AI screen and meeting recorder that captures video and audio, then transcribes and summarizes the content automatically. Scriberr: Open-source, self-hosted AI audio transcription app that runs Whisper models locally with speaker diarization, summaries, and chat-with-transcript. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription workflows, shortlist ScreenApp when recording and transcribing webinars matters most, and Scriberr when privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
ScreenApp is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Scriberr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Local, offline transcription using Whisper models via the WhisperX engine
Standout feature
Automatic transcription
Automatic speaker diarization (who said what)
Team usage
AI summaries and notes
AI summaries with custom prompts via Ollama or OpenAI-compatible providers
Integrations
Searchable recordings
Chat with your transcripts to ask questions and pull insights
Languages & capture
Sharing and export
Built-in audio recorder and note-taking on transcripts
Best-fit workflow
Screen and meeting recording
Folder watcher and API endpoints for automation workflows
Best for
ScreenApp
Choose ScreenApp if you need recording and transcribing webinars — strengths include flexible recording beyond meetings.
Scriberr
Choose Scriberr if you need privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure — strengths include fully self-hosted and offline, keeping audio and transcripts on your own hardware.
Pros & cons
ScreenApp
+ Flexible recording beyond meetings
+ Turns any recording into searchable notes
- Broad scope rather than meeting-specialized
Scriberr
+ Fully self-hosted and offline, keeping audio and transcripts on your own hardware
+ MIT-licensed and free to run with no per-minute charges
- Active development was publicly paused by the maintainer, relying on community contributions
FAQ
Is ScreenApp or Scriberr better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. ScreenApp is strong for recording and transcribing webinars, while Scriberr is strong for privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do ScreenApp and Scriberr compare on price?
ScreenApp is a free tier with paid upgrades and Scriberr is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both ScreenApp and Scriberr?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.