Runo and Tana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Runo: India-based SIM-based call management CRM with an AI call summary feature that transcribes sales calls and generates summaries, action items, sentiment, and CRM updates. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Runo when summarizing and transcribing outbound and inbound sales calls for mobile sales teams matters most, and Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
India-based SIM-based call management CRM with an AI call summary feature that transcribes sales calls and generates summaries, action items, sentiment, and CRM updates.
AI call summaries capturing key points, customer intent, objections, and outcomesAutomatic CRM sync of summaries and dispositionsCall transcription that converts conversations into searchable text
Runo is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
AI call summaries capturing key points, customer intent, objections, and outcomes
Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio
Standout feature
Call transcription that converts conversations into searchable text
Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings
Team usage
Sentiment scoring and call disposition tagging
Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace
Integrations
Automatic CRM sync of summaries and dispositions
Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects
Languages & capture
SIM-based call management from real phone numbers
Automatic meeting detection on Mac
Best-fit workflow
Mobile apps (iOS and Android) plus a web dashboard
60+ language support with automatic detection
Best for
Runo
Choose Runo if you need summarizing and transcribing outbound and inbound sales calls for mobile sales teams — strengths include purpose-built for india's mobile-first, sim-based calling sales teams.
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
Pros & cons
Runo
+ Purpose-built for India's mobile-first, SIM-based calling sales teams
+ Removes manual note-taking by auto-generating summaries and pushing them to CRM
- AI insights are tightly coupled to Runo's own call-management CRM rather than a standalone meeting tool
Tana
+ Captures meetings without adding a bot to the call
+ Meeting notes flow into a connected, structured knowledge base
- Requires the Tana desktop app and adopting its outliner workflow
FAQ
Is Runo or Tana better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Runo is strong for summarizing and transcribing outbound and inbound sales calls for mobile sales teams, while Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Runo and Tana compare on price?
Runo is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Runo and Tana?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.