Riverside and Tana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Riverside: Browser-based podcast and video recording studio with AI transcription, captions, and text-based editing that also handles interviews and remote meetings. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Riverside when transcribing and captioning recorded podcast episodes and video interviews matters most, and Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Browser-based podcast and video recording studio with AI transcription, captions, and text-based editing that also handles interviews and remote meetings.
AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base.
Riverside is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Riverside | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | AI-generated transcripts with automatic speaker detection and labeling | Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio |
| Standout feature | Transcription support across more than 100 languages | Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings |
| Team usage | Caption and subtitle export in SRT and VTT formats | Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace |
| Integrations | Text-based editing that lets users cut and rearrange recordings by editing the transcript | Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects |
| Languages & capture | Local high-quality recording of each participant's audio and video track | Automatic meeting detection on Mac |
| Best-fit workflow | AI clip generation for short-form social video | 60+ language support with automatic detection |
Riverside
Choose Riverside if you need transcribing and captioning recorded podcast episodes and video interviews — strengths include records each participant locally, producing cleaner audio and video than typical call recording.
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
Riverside
Tana
It depends on your workflow. Riverside is strong for transcribing and captioning recorded podcast episodes and video interviews, while Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Riverside is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.