Rimo Voice and Tana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Rimo Voice: Japanese AI meeting assistant by Rimo LLC that joins calls via a recording bot, transcribes in 30+ languages, and generates minutes, with data stored in Japan. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Rimo Voice when japanese companies automating meeting minutes matters most, and Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Japanese AI meeting assistant by Rimo LLC that joins calls via a recording bot, transcribes in 30+ languages, and generates minutes, with data stored in Japan.
AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base.
Rimo Voice is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Rimo Voice | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Recording bot for Zoom, Google Meet, Teams, and Webex | Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio |
| Standout feature | High-precision Japanese transcription with custom dictionaries | Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings |
| Team usage | Support for 30+ languages | Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace |
| Integrations | AI summaries, next actions, and filler-word removal | Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects |
| Languages & capture | Real-time collaborative editing of minutes | Automatic meeting detection on Mac |
| Best-fit workflow | Data residency in Japan with ISO 27001/27017 certification | 60+ language support with automatic detection |
Rimo Voice
Choose Rimo Voice if you need japanese companies automating meeting minutes — strengths include strong japanese-language accuracy and terminology handling.
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
Rimo Voice
Tana
It depends on your workflow. Rimo Voice is strong for japanese companies automating meeting minutes, while Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Rimo Voice is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.