Rimo Voice and Soniox are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Rimo Voice: Japanese AI meeting assistant by Rimo LLC that joins calls via a recording bot, transcribes in 30+ languages, and generates minutes, with data stored in Japan. Soniox: Multilingual speech AI platform offering real-time and async speech-to-text and translation APIs for meetings and voice apps. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Rimo Voice when japanese companies automating meeting minutes matters most, and Soniox when transcribing multilingual meetings and calls in real time matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Japanese AI meeting assistant by Rimo LLC that joins calls via a recording bot, transcribes in 30+ languages, and generates minutes, with data stored in Japan.
Multilingual speech AI platform offering real-time and async speech-to-text and translation APIs for meetings and voice apps.
Rimo Voice is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Soniox is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Rimo Voice | Soniox |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Recording bot for Zoom, Google Meet, Teams, and Webex | Real-time and asynchronous speech-to-text APIs |
| Standout feature | High-precision Japanese transcription with custom dictionaries | Speaker separation for multi-participant conversations |
| Team usage | Support for 30+ languages | Real-time speech translation across many language pairs |
| Integrations | AI summaries, next actions, and filler-word removal | Code-switching support for mid-sentence language changes |
| Languages & capture | Real-time collaborative editing of minutes | Web and server SDKs for browser and backend integration |
| Best-fit workflow | Data residency in Japan with ISO 27001/27017 certification | Enterprise compliance with SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR |
Rimo Voice
Choose Rimo Voice if you need japanese companies automating meeting minutes — strengths include strong japanese-language accuracy and terminology handling.
Soniox
Choose Soniox if you need transcribing multilingual meetings and calls in real time — strengths include strong multilingual and translation capabilities for global meetings.
Rimo Voice
Soniox
It depends on your workflow. Rimo Voice is strong for japanese companies automating meeting minutes, while Soniox is strong for transcribing multilingual meetings and calls in real time. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Rimo Voice is a free tier with paid upgrades and Soniox is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.