Reduct and TeamRetro are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Reduct: Transcription and text-based video editing platform that can capture live Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams calls and make hours of recordings searchable by text. TeamRetro: Purpose-built online tool for running agile retrospectives, team health checks, and planning poker with AI-assisted idea grouping and summaries. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Reduct when capturing and transcribing live zoom, meet, or teams meetings and interviews matters most, and TeamRetro when running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Transcription and text-based video editing platform that can capture live Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams calls and make hours of recordings searchable by text.
Purpose-built online tool for running agile retrospectives, team health checks, and planning poker with AI-assisted idea grouping and summaries.
Reduct is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); TeamRetro is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Reduct | TeamRetro |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Transcription of large volumes of audio and video into searchable text | Guided retrospective workflow with anonymous input, grouping, and dot voting |
| Standout feature | Live Capture that joins and records Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams calls | AI-assisted automatic grouping of similar ideas into themes |
| Team usage | Text-based video editing by selecting and cutting transcript text | AI-generated retrospective summaries (when enabled by the organization) |
| Integrations | Annotation, highlighting, and clip-sharing tools for collaboration | Recurring team health checks with trend and sentiment tracking over time |
| Languages & capture | Redaction tools for removing sensitive content from recordings | Large library of retrospective templates and icebreaker activities |
| Best-fit workflow | Translation of transcripts | Action-item tracking carried across sessions |
Reduct
Choose Reduct if you need capturing and transcribing live zoom, meet, or teams meetings and interviews — strengths include makes long recordings navigable by searching and editing transcript text.
TeamRetro
Choose TeamRetro if you need running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams — strengths include purpose-built for retrospectives rather than a repurposed generic whiteboard.
Reduct
TeamRetro
It depends on your workflow. Reduct is strong for capturing and transcribing live zoom, meet, or teams meetings and interviews, while TeamRetro is strong for running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Reduct is a free tier with paid upgrades and TeamRetro is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.