Reduct and Tana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Reduct: Transcription and text-based video editing platform that can capture live Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams calls and make hours of recordings searchable by text. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Reduct when capturing and transcribing live zoom, meet, or teams meetings and interviews matters most, and Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Transcription and text-based video editing platform that can capture live Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams calls and make hours of recordings searchable by text.
AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base.
Reduct is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Reduct | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Transcription of large volumes of audio and video into searchable text | Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio |
| Standout feature | Live Capture that joins and records Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams calls | Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings |
| Team usage | Text-based video editing by selecting and cutting transcript text | Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace |
| Integrations | Annotation, highlighting, and clip-sharing tools for collaboration | Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects |
| Languages & capture | Redaction tools for removing sensitive content from recordings | Automatic meeting detection on Mac |
| Best-fit workflow | Translation of transcripts | 60+ language support with automatic detection |
Reduct
Choose Reduct if you need capturing and transcribing live zoom, meet, or teams meetings and interviews — strengths include makes long recordings navigable by searching and editing transcript text.
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
Reduct
Tana
It depends on your workflow. Reduct is strong for capturing and transcribing live zoom, meet, or teams meetings and interviews, while Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Reduct is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.