Reduct and Speakr are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Reduct: Transcription and text-based video editing platform that can capture live Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams calls and make hours of recordings searchable by text. Speakr: Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Reduct when capturing and transcribing live zoom, meet, or teams meetings and interviews matters most, and Speakr when privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Transcription and text-based video editing platform that can capture live Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams calls and make hours of recordings searchable by text.
Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search.
Reduct is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Reduct | Speakr |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Transcription of large volumes of audio and video into searchable text | Self-hosted transcription with automatic language detection |
| Standout feature | Live Capture that joins and records Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams calls | Optional AI-powered speaker diarization |
| Team usage | Text-based video editing by selecting and cutting transcript text | Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks |
| Integrations | Annotation, highlighting, and clip-sharing tools for collaboration | Per-recording chat and an Inquire Mode for semantic search across the whole library |
| Languages & capture | Redaction tools for removing sensitive content from recordings | System and browser-tab audio capture |
| Best-fit workflow | Translation of transcripts | Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard |
Reduct
Choose Reduct if you need capturing and transcribing live zoom, meet, or teams meetings and interviews — strengths include makes long recordings navigable by searching and editing transcript text.
Speakr
Choose Speakr if you need privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings — strengths include runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control.
Reduct
Speakr
It depends on your workflow. Reduct is strong for capturing and transcribing live zoom, meet, or teams meetings and interviews, while Speakr is strong for privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Reduct is a free tier with paid upgrades and Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.