Recast Studio and Speakr are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Recast Studio: AI video repurposing tool that turns webinars, podcasts, interviews, and Zoom recordings into captioned clips and written content. Speakr: Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Recast Studio when turning a recorded webinar into short captioned clips for social channels matters most, and Speakr when privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI video repurposing tool that turns webinars, podcasts, interviews, and Zoom recordings into captioned clips and written content.
Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search.
Recast Studio is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Recast Studio | Speakr |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Transcribes webinars, podcasts, interviews, and Zoom recordings | Self-hosted transcription with automatic language detection |
| Standout feature | Transcript-based editing that trims video by editing text | Optional AI-powered speaker diarization |
| Team usage | Automatic reframing with face detection and filler-word/pause removal | Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks |
| Integrations | Caption generation synced to edits across 20+ languages | Per-recording chat and an Inquire Mode for semantic search across the whole library |
| Languages & capture | AI-generated blog drafts, show notes, LinkedIn posts, and email summaries | System and browser-tab audio capture |
| Best-fit workflow | Direct publishing and scheduling to multiple social platforms | Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard |
Recast Studio
Choose Recast Studio if you need turning a recorded webinar into short captioned clips for social channels — strengths include explicitly handles webinar and zoom recordings, not just podcasts.
Speakr
Choose Speakr if you need privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings — strengths include runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control.
Recast Studio
Speakr
It depends on your workflow. Recast Studio is strong for turning a recorded webinar into short captioned clips for social channels, while Speakr is strong for privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Recast Studio is a free tier with paid upgrades and Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.