Pulse360 and Yating are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Pulse360: Meeting note and client-communication platform for financial advisors that captures notes and produces professional deliverables. Yating: Taiwan-built AI speech-to-text app for classes, meetings, and interviews, optimized for Taiwanese-accent Mandarin and Mandarin-English code-switching. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Pulse360 when capturing client meeting notes and turning them into annual summary documents matters most, and Yating when students transcribing lectures and classes in mandarin or mixed mandarin-english matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Meeting note and client-communication platform for financial advisors that captures notes and produces professional deliverables.
Taiwan-built AI speech-to-text app for classes, meetings, and interviews, optimized for Taiwanese-accent Mandarin and Mandarin-English code-switching.
Pulse360 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Yating is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Pulse360 | Yating |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Flexible meeting capture via recording, dictation, typing, or handwriting | Live microphone transcription plus transcription of recorded and uploaded files |
| Standout feature | Meeting capture integration with Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet | Optimized for Taiwanese-accent Mandarin and Mandarin-English code-switching |
| Team usage | AI note organization that keeps notes searchable and separate from the CRM | Support for Mandarin, Taiwanese, English, Japanese, and Cantonese |
| Integrations | Template builder for annual summaries, prep notes, and review documents | Speaker identification with timestamps |
| Languages & capture | AI rephrasing to improve client communications | Subtitle mode for accessibility |
| Best-fit workflow | CRM integrations with Salesforce, Wealthbox, Redtail, Practifi, and Salentica | Cross-platform: mobile, web, and Chrome plugin |
Pulse360
Choose Pulse360 if you need capturing client meeting notes and turning them into annual summary documents — strengths include combines note capture with professional client deliverable creation.
Yating
Choose Yating if you need students transcribing lectures and classes in mandarin or mixed mandarin-english — strengths include strong handling of taiwanese-accent mandarin and chinese-english code-switching.
Pulse360
Yating
It depends on your workflow. Pulse360 is strong for capturing client meeting notes and turning them into annual summary documents, while Yating is strong for students transcribing lectures and classes in mandarin or mixed mandarin-english. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Pulse360 is a free tier with paid upgrades and Yating is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.