Pulse360 and Userology are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Pulse360: Meeting note and client-communication platform for financial advisors that captures notes and produces professional deliverables. Userology: Vision-aware AI UX research agent that moderates usability and concept-testing interviews and reports task metrics and insights. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Pulse360 when capturing client meeting notes and turning them into annual summary documents matters most, and Userology when ai-moderated usability and prototype testing of apps and web products matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Meeting note and client-communication platform for financial advisors that captures notes and produces professional deliverables.
Vision-aware AI UX research agent that moderates usability and concept-testing interviews and reports task metrics and insights.
Pulse360 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Userology is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Pulse360 | Userology |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Flexible meeting capture via recording, dictation, typing, or handwriting | Vision-aware AI moderator that observes on-screen task completion |
| Standout feature | Meeting capture integration with Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet | Context-aware follow-ups with silence detection and glitch handling |
| Team usage | AI note organization that keeps notes searchable and separate from the CRM | Multiple methods: voice interviews, prototype testing, live product research, diary studies |
| Integrations | Template builder for annual summaries, prep notes, and review documents | Automated reports with transcripts, insights, and task-based metrics |
| Languages & capture | AI rephrasing to improve client communications | Chat-with-your-research data exploration |
| Best-fit workflow | CRM integrations with Salesforce, Wealthbox, Redtail, Practifi, and Salentica | Built-in panel recruitment plus User Interviews integration, 40+ languages |
Pulse360
Choose Pulse360 if you need capturing client meeting notes and turning them into annual summary documents — strengths include combines note capture with professional client deliverable creation.
Userology
Choose Userology if you need ai-moderated usability and prototype testing of apps and web products — strengths include vision awareness supports usability and prototype testing, not just verbal interviews.
Pulse360
Userology
It depends on your workflow. Pulse360 is strong for capturing client meeting notes and turning them into annual summary documents, while Userology is strong for ai-moderated usability and prototype testing of apps and web products. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Pulse360 is a free tier with paid upgrades and Userology is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.