Pulse360 and meetXcc are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Pulse360: Meeting note and client-communication platform for financial advisors that captures notes and produces professional deliverables. meetXcc: Bot-free Chrome extension that joins Google Meet invisibly, transcribes in many languages, and turns conversations into structured notes, mind maps, and action items. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Pulse360 when capturing client meeting notes and turning them into annual summary documents matters most, and meetXcc when google meet users who want bot-free capture without an extra participant matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Meeting note and client-communication platform for financial advisors that captures notes and produces professional deliverables.
Bot-free Chrome extension that joins Google Meet invisibly, transcribes in many languages, and turns conversations into structured notes, mind maps, and action items.
Pulse360 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); meetXcc is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Pulse360 | meetXcc |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Flexible meeting capture via recording, dictation, typing, or handwriting | Bot-free, invisible capture inside Google Meet |
| Standout feature | Meeting capture integration with Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet | Real-time transcription across many languages |
| Team usage | AI note organization that keeps notes searchable and separate from the CRM | AI summaries organized by people, topics, and timeline |
| Integrations | Template builder for annual summaries, prep notes, and review documents | Mind map generation from meeting content |
| Languages & capture | AI rephrasing to improve client communications | Action item and highlight extraction with inline note-taking |
| Best-fit workflow | CRM integrations with Salesforce, Wealthbox, Redtail, Practifi, and Salentica | One-click export, email, and cloud storage sync |
Pulse360
Choose Pulse360 if you need capturing client meeting notes and turning them into annual summary documents — strengths include combines note capture with professional client deliverable creation.
meetXcc
Choose meetXcc if you need google meet users who want bot-free capture without an extra participant — strengths include invisible, bot-free capture avoids adding a participant to the call.
Pulse360
meetXcc
It depends on your workflow. Pulse360 is strong for capturing client meeting notes and turning them into annual summary documents, while meetXcc is strong for google meet users who want bot-free capture without an extra participant. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Pulse360 is a free tier with paid upgrades and meetXcc is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.