Proactor AI and Zeplyn are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Proactor AI: AI note-taking app that records conversations, transcribes in real time, and turns meetings into structured notes and tasks. Zeplyn: AI meeting assistant for wealth managers that captures structured notes without recording and syncs them to advisor CRMs. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Proactor AI when capturing meetings and immediately generating assignable follow-up tasks matters most, and Zeplyn when capturing structured notes from client review and prospect meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Proactor AI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Zeplyn is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Recording-free structured note capture from client meetings
Standout feature
AI summaries, key insights, and in-conversation suggestions
Support for virtual meetings, in-person meetings, and dictations
Team usage
Automatic action items with assigned owners and due dates
Automatic generation of tasks, updates, and follow-up emails
Integrations
Notes organized by speaker and topic
One-click CRM sync with Salesforce, Redtail, HubSpot, and Wealthbox
Languages & capture
Cross-session context retention
Pre-meeting smart client summaries and discussion agendas
Best-fit workflow
Export to PDF, Word, Markdown, and TXT
Integrations with Gmail, Outlook, Zoom, Teams, and Google Calendar
Best for
Proactor AI
Choose Proactor AI if you need capturing meetings and immediately generating assignable follow-up tasks — strengths include converts conversations directly into trackable tasks with owners and due dates.
Zeplyn
Choose Zeplyn if you need capturing structured notes from client review and prospect meetings — strengths include built specifically for wealth management workflows.
Pros & cons
Proactor AI
+ Converts conversations directly into trackable tasks with owners and due dates
+ Real-time transcription and suggestions during the meeting
- Advanced capabilities are gated behind paid subscription tiers
Zeplyn
+ Built specifically for wealth management workflows
+ Captures structured financial details and action items, not just raw transcript
- Specialized for financial advisors, limiting fit for other industries
FAQ
Is Proactor AI or Zeplyn better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Proactor AI is strong for capturing meetings and immediately generating assignable follow-up tasks, while Zeplyn is strong for capturing structured notes from client review and prospect meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Proactor AI and Zeplyn compare on price?
Proactor AI is a free tier with paid upgrades and Zeplyn is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Proactor AI and Zeplyn?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.