Proactor AI and timeOS are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Proactor AI: AI note-taking app that records conversations, transcribes in real time, and turns meetings into structured notes and tasks. timeOS: AI meeting assistant that captures, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and routes notes and action items into your tools. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Proactor AI when capturing meetings and immediately generating assignable follow-up tasks matters most, and timeOS when automated post-meeting workflows matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI note-taking app that records conversations, transcribes in real time, and turns meetings into structured notes and tasks.
AI meeting assistant that captures, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and routes notes and action items into your tools.
Proactor AI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); timeOS is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Proactor AI | timeOS |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Real-time speech-to-text transcription | Automatic capture and transcription |
| Standout feature | AI summaries, key insights, and in-conversation suggestions | AI summaries and action items |
| Team usage | Automatic action items with assigned owners and due dates | Sync notes to docs and task tools |
| Integrations | Notes organized by speaker and topic | Multi-language support |
| Languages & capture | Cross-session context retention | Shareable recaps |
| Best-fit workflow | Export to PDF, Word, Markdown, and TXT | Automatic capture and transcription |
Proactor AI
Choose Proactor AI if you need capturing meetings and immediately generating assignable follow-up tasks — strengths include converts conversations directly into trackable tasks with owners and due dates.
timeOS
Choose timeOS if you need automated post-meeting workflows — strengths include automates post-meeting follow-up across tools.
Proactor AI
timeOS
It depends on your workflow. Proactor AI is strong for capturing meetings and immediately generating assignable follow-up tasks, while timeOS is strong for automated post-meeting workflows. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Proactor AI is a free tier with paid upgrades and timeOS is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.