Proactor AI and Terret are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Proactor AI: AI note-taking app that records conversations, transcribes in real time, and turns meetings into structured notes and tasks. Terret: AI revenue intelligence platform (formerly BoostUp) with native conversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls to drive forecasting and coaching. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Proactor AI when capturing meetings and immediately generating assignable follow-up tasks matters most, and Terret when analyzing recorded sales calls to inform forecasting and deal-health scoring matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI revenue intelligence platform (formerly BoostUp) with native conversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls to drive forecasting and coaching.
AI-generated sales playbooks based on top-performer behavior
Automatic CRM field population and follow-up action generation
Conversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls at scale
Proactor AI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Terret is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Conversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls at scale
Standout feature
AI summaries, key insights, and in-conversation suggestions
Native integration of call insights with AI forecasting and deal scoring
Team usage
Automatic action items with assigned owners and due dates
Automatic CRM field population and follow-up action generation
Integrations
Notes organized by speaker and topic
AI-generated sales playbooks based on top-performer behavior
Languages & capture
Cross-session context retention
Real-time pre-call briefs delivered via Slack
Best-fit workflow
Export to PDF, Word, Markdown, and TXT
Deal-risk detection, product-gap analysis, and expansion-signal surfacing
Best for
Proactor AI
Choose Proactor AI if you need capturing meetings and immediately generating assignable follow-up tasks — strengths include converts conversations directly into trackable tasks with owners and due dates.
Terret
Choose Terret if you need analyzing recorded sales calls to inform forecasting and deal-health scoring — strengths include conversation intelligence is tightly coupled to forecasting and pipeline analytics.
Pros & cons
Proactor AI
+ Converts conversations directly into trackable tasks with owners and due dates
+ Real-time transcription and suggestions during the meeting
- Advanced capabilities are gated behind paid subscription tiers
Terret
+ Conversation intelligence is tightly coupled to forecasting and pipeline analytics
+ Automates CRM updates and methodology-field population to reduce admin work
- Oriented toward mid-market and enterprise revenue teams rather than small teams
FAQ
Is Proactor AI or Terret better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Proactor AI is strong for capturing meetings and immediately generating assignable follow-up tasks, while Terret is strong for analyzing recorded sales calls to inform forecasting and deal-health scoring. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Proactor AI and Terret compare on price?
Proactor AI is a free tier with paid upgrades and Terret is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Proactor AI and Terret?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.
Proactor AI vs Terret: Pricing, Features & Recommendation | Hosiqo