Proactor AI and SmartDepo are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Proactor AI: AI note-taking app that records conversations, transcribes in real time, and turns meetings into structured notes and tasks. SmartDepo: AI deposition summary platform for litigators that produces cited summaries with page-line citations. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Proactor AI when capturing meetings and immediately generating assignable follow-up tasks matters most, and SmartDepo when generating cited page-line summaries of deposition transcripts matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Proactor AI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); SmartDepo is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
AI summaries, key insights, and in-conversation suggestions
Multiple summary formats: page/line summaries, key admissions, abstracts, and memos
Team usage
Automatic action items with assigned owners and due dates
Topic detection that organizes content like attorney case materials
Integrations
Notes organized by speaker and topic
Full-transcript analysis without omissions
Languages & capture
Cross-session context retention
Human review of AI-generated summaries by legal professionals
Best-fit workflow
Export to PDF, Word, Markdown, and TXT
Fast turnaround, with summaries produced in minutes
Best for
Proactor AI
Choose Proactor AI if you need capturing meetings and immediately generating assignable follow-up tasks — strengths include converts conversations directly into trackable tasks with owners and due dates.
SmartDepo
Choose SmartDepo if you need generating cited page-line summaries of deposition transcripts — strengths include citation-focused output suitable for court filings.
Pros & cons
Proactor AI
+ Converts conversations directly into trackable tasks with owners and due dates
+ Real-time transcription and suggestions during the meeting
- Advanced capabilities are gated behind paid subscription tiers
SmartDepo
+ Citation-focused output suitable for court filings
+ Multiple summary formats tailored to different litigation tasks
- Narrowly focused on deposition summaries rather than live transcription or general meetings
FAQ
Is Proactor AI or SmartDepo better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Proactor AI is strong for capturing meetings and immediately generating assignable follow-up tasks, while SmartDepo is strong for generating cited page-line summaries of deposition transcripts. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Proactor AI and SmartDepo compare on price?
Proactor AI is a free tier with paid upgrades and SmartDepo is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Proactor AI and SmartDepo?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.