Proactor AI and Skribby are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Proactor AI: AI note-taking app that records conversations, transcribes in real time, and turns meetings into structured notes and tasks. Skribby: Developer-focused meeting bot API by Skribe VOF that deploys recording and transcription bots to Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet with bring-your-own-key transcription. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Proactor AI when capturing meetings and immediately generating assignable follow-up tasks matters most, and Skribby when adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI note-taking app that records conversations, transcribes in real time, and turns meetings into structured notes and tasks.
Developer-focused meeting bot API by Skribe VOF that deploys recording and transcription bots to Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet with bring-your-own-key transcription.
Proactor AI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Skribby is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Proactor AI | Skribby |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Real-time speech-to-text transcription | Meeting bots that join and record Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet |
| Standout feature | AI summaries, key insights, and in-conversation suggestions | Real-time transcription over WebSocket plus asynchronous transcripts |
| Team usage | Automatic action items with assigned owners and due dates | Bring-your-own-key support for 10+ transcription providers (Deepgram, Whisper, AssemblyAI, Soniox, ElevenLabs) |
| Integrations | Notes organized by speaker and topic | Webhook notifications for transcripts and bot events |
| Languages & capture | Cross-session context retention | Speaker identification (diarization) and 30+ language support |
| Best-fit workflow | Export to PDF, Word, Markdown, and TXT | Bot authentication for joining restricted meetings |
Proactor AI
Choose Proactor AI if you need capturing meetings and immediately generating assignable follow-up tasks — strengths include converts conversations directly into trackable tasks with owners and due dates.
Skribby
Choose Skribby if you need adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api — strengths include pay-as-you-go api with no monthly minimums or contracts.
Proactor AI
Skribby
It depends on your workflow. Proactor AI is strong for capturing meetings and immediately generating assignable follow-up tasks, while Skribby is strong for adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Proactor AI is a free tier with paid upgrades and Skribby is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.