Proactor AI and joinly are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Proactor AI: AI note-taking app that records conversations, transcribes in real time, and turns meetings into structured notes and tasks. joinly: Open-source, self-hostable connector that lets AI agents join Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams calls to transcribe, listen, and act in real time via MCP. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Proactor AI when capturing meetings and immediately generating assignable follow-up tasks matters most, and joinly when building custom ai meeting agents that answer questions and run tasks during live calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, self-hostable connector that lets AI agents join Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams calls to transcribe, listen, and act in real time via MCP.
Cross-platform support for Google Meet, Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and browser-based calls
Docker-based self-hosting with optional CUDA GPU image
MCP server that exposes meeting tools (join/leave, transcript, chat, audio control, snapshots) to AI agents
Proactor AI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); joinly is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
MCP server that exposes meeting tools (join/leave, transcript, chat, audio control, snapshots) to AI agents
Standout feature
AI summaries, key insights, and in-conversation suggestions
Real-time transcription with timestamps and speaker information, subscribable for live updates
Team usage
Automatic action items with assigned owners and due dates
Cross-platform support for Google Meet, Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and browser-based calls
Integrations
Notes organized by speaker and topic
Modular speech-to-text and text-to-speech backends (Whisper, Deepgram, Kokoro, ElevenLabs)
Languages & capture
Cross-session context retention
Model-agnostic: works with OpenAI, Anthropic, and local LLMs via Ollama
Best-fit workflow
Export to PDF, Word, Markdown, and TXT
Docker-based self-hosting with optional CUDA GPU image
Best for
Proactor AI
Choose Proactor AI if you need capturing meetings and immediately generating assignable follow-up tasks — strengths include converts conversations directly into trackable tasks with owners and due dates.
joinly
Choose joinly if you need building custom ai meeting agents that answer questions and run tasks during live calls — strengths include fully open source (mit) and self-hostable for complete data control.
Pros & cons
Proactor AI
+ Converts conversations directly into trackable tasks with owners and due dates
+ Real-time transcription and suggestions during the meeting
- Advanced capabilities are gated behind paid subscription tiers
joinly
+ Fully open source (MIT) and self-hostable for complete data control
+ Agents can actively participate by voice and chat, not just passively transcribe
- Developer-oriented framework that requires setup and engineering effort rather than a ready-made app
FAQ
Is Proactor AI or joinly better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Proactor AI is strong for capturing meetings and immediately generating assignable follow-up tasks, while joinly is strong for building custom ai meeting agents that answer questions and run tasks during live calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Proactor AI and joinly compare on price?
Proactor AI is a free tier with paid upgrades and joinly is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Proactor AI and joinly?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.