People.ai and Tana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. People.ai: Enterprise revenue intelligence platform that automatically captures sales activity from emails, calls, and meetings and maps it to deals and accounts. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist People.ai when automating crm activity logging for enterprise sales teams matters most, and Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Enterprise revenue intelligence platform that automatically captures sales activity from emails, calls, and meetings and maps it to deals and accounts.
AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base.
People.ai is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | People.ai | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automated activity capture across email, calendar, calls, and meetings | Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio |
| Standout feature | CRM data syncing and enrichment (Salesforce and other CRMs) | Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings |
| Team usage | Account and relationship mapping for complex deals | Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace |
| Integrations | Deal and opportunity health scoring | Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects |
| Languages & capture | Generative AI assistant for querying deal and account data | Automatic meeting detection on Mac |
| Best-fit workflow | PeopleGlass spreadsheet-style CRM editing interface | 60+ language support with automatic detection |
People.ai
Choose People.ai if you need automating crm activity logging for enterprise sales teams — strengths include reduces manual crm data entry by capturing activity automatically.
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
People.ai
Tana
It depends on your workflow. People.ai is strong for automating crm activity logging for enterprise sales teams, while Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
People.ai is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.