Owll and Tana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Owll: AI meeting assistant that records and transcribes calls and meetings into summaries and prioritized action items. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Owll when transcribing and summarizing virtual meetings on zoom or teams matters most, and Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI meeting assistant that records and transcribes calls and meetings into summaries and prioritized action items.
AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base.
Owll is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Owll | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Real-time transcription for Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams | Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio |
| Standout feature | Live or post-call recording, plus phone and other audio sources | Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings |
| Team usage | Automated summaries with extracted, priority-tagged action items | Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace |
| Integrations | iOS and Android apps with Apple Watch support | Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects |
| Languages & capture | Web access with cloud storage for recordings and summaries | Automatic meeting detection on Mac |
| Best-fit workflow | Conversion of transcripts into structured smart notes | 60+ language support with automatic detection |
Owll
Choose Owll if you need transcribing and summarizing virtual meetings on zoom or teams — strengths include works across major video meeting platforms and mobile.
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
Owll
Tana
It depends on your workflow. Owll is strong for transcribing and summarizing virtual meetings on zoom or teams, while Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Owll is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.