Outdoo (formerly MeetRecord) and Typist are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Outdoo (formerly MeetRecord): AI platform combining call intelligence, revenue intelligence, and AI roleplay to score sales calls and coach reps. Typist: AI speech-to-text service that converts audio and video into text and exports captions, with tiered models for speed or accuracy. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Outdoo (formerly MeetRecord) when scoring real sales calls to identify coaching opportunities matters most, and Typist when transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI platform combining call intelligence, revenue intelligence, and AI roleplay to score sales calls and coach reps.
AI roleplay with diverse buyer personas built from real conversationsCall intelligence that scores real sales calls and flags coaching needsIntegrations with CRM (Salesforce) and LMS (Docebo)
AI speech-to-text service that converts audio and video into text and exports captions, with tiered models for speed or accuracy.
Audio and video to text transcription across many file formatsExport to SRT subtitles, WebVTT captions, DOCX, PDF, and TXTMultiple transcription models trading off speed and accuracy
Outdoo (formerly MeetRecord) is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Typist is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Call intelligence that scores real sales calls and flags coaching needs
Audio and video to text transcription across many file formats
Standout feature
AI roleplay with diverse buyer personas built from real conversations
Export to SRT subtitles, WebVTT captions, DOCX, PDF, and TXT
Team usage
Revenue intelligence linking skill improvement to conversion outcomes
Multiple transcription models trading off speed and accuracy
Integrations
Skill benchmarking and readiness tracking across reps
Speaker identification on the highest-accuracy tier
Languages & capture
Software workflow simulation for product training
Word-level and segment-level timestamps for clean subtitle timing
Best-fit workflow
Integrations with CRM (Salesforce) and LMS (Docebo)
Support for a wide range of languages and accents
Best for
Outdoo (formerly MeetRecord)
Choose Outdoo (formerly MeetRecord) if you need scoring real sales calls to identify coaching opportunities — strengths include connects real-call analysis with structured practice in one platform.
Typist
Choose Typist if you need transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls — strengths include clean subtitle exports (srt and webvtt) that import into video editors.
Pros & cons
Outdoo (formerly MeetRecord)
+ Connects real-call analysis with structured practice in one platform
+ Ties coaching activity to measurable revenue outcomes
- The site does not clearly specify how calls are captured or recorded
Typist
+ Clean subtitle exports (SRT and WebVTT) that import into video editors
+ Choice of models lets users prioritize speed or accuracy per job
- Speaker identification is limited to the top tier
FAQ
Is Outdoo (formerly MeetRecord) or Typist better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Outdoo (formerly MeetRecord) is strong for scoring real sales calls to identify coaching opportunities, while Typist is strong for transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Outdoo (formerly MeetRecord) and Typist compare on price?
Outdoo (formerly MeetRecord) is a free tier with paid upgrades and Typist is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Outdoo (formerly MeetRecord) and Typist?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.