Outdoo (formerly MeetRecord) and Rafiki are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Outdoo (formerly MeetRecord): AI platform combining call intelligence, revenue intelligence, and AI roleplay to score sales calls and coach reps. Rafiki: AI sales intelligence platform that records, transcribes, and analyzes sales conversations to surface deal and coaching insights. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-sales-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-sales-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Outdoo (formerly MeetRecord) when scoring real sales calls to identify coaching opportunities matters most, and Rafiki when automatically capturing notes and action items from sales calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI platform combining call intelligence, revenue intelligence, and AI roleplay to score sales calls and coach reps.
AI roleplay with diverse buyer personas built from real conversationsCall intelligence that scores real sales calls and flags coaching needsIntegrations with CRM (Salesforce) and LMS (Docebo)
AI sales intelligence platform that records, transcribes, and analyzes sales conversations to surface deal and coaching insights.
AI-generated meeting summaries and follow-up email draftsAI role play for rep training and a natural-language 'Ask Rafiki' query toolCall scoring against MEDDIC and BANT frameworks
Outdoo (formerly MeetRecord) is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Rafiki is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Call intelligence that scores real sales calls and flags coaching needs
Records and transcribes calls across Zoom, Google Meet, Teams, and phone
Standout feature
AI roleplay with diverse buyer personas built from real conversations
AI-generated meeting summaries and follow-up email drafts
Team usage
Revenue intelligence linking skill improvement to conversion outcomes
Call scoring against MEDDIC and BANT frameworks
Integrations
Skill benchmarking and readiness tracking across reps
Deal and pipeline-level conversation analysis
Languages & capture
Software workflow simulation for product training
CRM integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, Zoho, and Pipedrive
Best-fit workflow
Integrations with CRM (Salesforce) and LMS (Docebo)
AI role play for rep training and a natural-language 'Ask Rafiki' query tool
Best for
Outdoo (formerly MeetRecord)
Choose Outdoo (formerly MeetRecord) if you need scoring real sales calls to identify coaching opportunities — strengths include connects real-call analysis with structured practice in one platform.
Rafiki
Choose Rafiki if you need automatically capturing notes and action items from sales calls — strengths include combines note-taking, coaching, and revenue intelligence in one platform.
Pros & cons
Outdoo (formerly MeetRecord)
+ Connects real-call analysis with structured practice in one platform
+ Ties coaching activity to measurable revenue outcomes
- The site does not clearly specify how calls are captured or recorded
Rafiki
+ Combines note-taking, coaching, and revenue intelligence in one platform
- Some advertised capabilities are listed as upcoming rather than fully shipped
FAQ
Is Outdoo (formerly MeetRecord) or Rafiki better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Outdoo (formerly MeetRecord) is strong for scoring real sales calls to identify coaching opportunities, while Rafiki is strong for automatically capturing notes and action items from sales calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Outdoo (formerly MeetRecord) and Rafiki compare on price?
Outdoo (formerly MeetRecord) is a free tier with paid upgrades and Rafiki is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Outdoo (formerly MeetRecord) and Rafiki?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.