Otolio and Scriberr are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Otolio: Japanese AI meeting-minutes service (formerly Smart Scribe) that transcribes and automates the full minutes workflow for businesses. Scriberr: Open-source, self-hosted AI audio transcription app that runs Whisper models locally with speaker diarization, summaries, and chat-with-transcript. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Otolio when japanese companies automating internal meeting minutes matters most, and Scriberr when privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Japanese AI meeting-minutes service (formerly Smart Scribe) that transcribes and automates the full minutes workflow for businesses.
Open-source, self-hosted AI audio transcription app that runs Whisper models locally with speaker diarization, summaries, and chat-with-transcript.
Otolio is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Scriberr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Otolio | Scriberr |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic transcription of in-person and web-conference audio | Local, offline transcription using Whisper models via the WhisperX engine |
| Standout feature | AI summarization and cleanup of meeting minutes | Automatic speaker diarization (who said what) |
| Team usage | Speaker visualization and specialized terminology registration | AI summaries with custom prompts via Ollama or OpenAI-compatible providers |
| Integrations | Filler-word removal for cleaner transcripts | Chat with your transcripts to ask questions and pull insights |
| Languages & capture | Dedicated minutes and sales agents in one interface | Built-in audio recorder and note-taking on transcripts |
| Best-fit workflow | Mobile app for transcription, playback, and file upload | Folder watcher and API endpoints for automation workflows |
Otolio
Choose Otolio if you need japanese companies automating internal meeting minutes — strengths include built for the japanese market with strong handling of japanese minutes workflows.
Scriberr
Choose Scriberr if you need privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure — strengths include fully self-hosted and offline, keeping audio and transcripts on your own hardware.
Otolio
Scriberr
It depends on your workflow. Otolio is strong for japanese companies automating internal meeting minutes, while Scriberr is strong for privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Otolio is a free tier with paid upgrades and Scriberr is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.