Orum and Tana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Orum: AI-powered parallel and power dialer for sales teams with automatic call recording, real-time assist, AI scoring, and roleplay coaching. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Orum when increasing live connect rates for sdr outbound calling matters most, and Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Orum is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Power and parallel dialing with live-answer detection
Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio
Standout feature
Automatic call logging and recording with timestamps
Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings
Team usage
Real-time Assist surfacing objection and competitor responses
Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace
Integrations
AI call scoring against proven criteria
Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects
Languages & capture
Scenario-based AI roleplay and coaching portals
Automatic meeting detection on Mac
Best-fit workflow
Power and parallel dialing with live-answer detection
60+ language support with automatic detection
Best for
Orum
Choose Orum if you need increasing live connect rates for sdr outbound calling — strengths include parallel dialing maximizes live conversations per session.
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
Pros & cons
Orum
+ Parallel dialing maximizes live conversations per session
+ Combines high-volume dialing with AI coaching and scoring
- Built for high-volume outbound calling, less suited to low-volume teams
Tana
+ Captures meetings without adding a bot to the call
+ Meeting notes flow into a connected, structured knowledge base
- Requires the Tana desktop app and adopting its outliner workflow
FAQ
Is Orum or Tana better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Orum is strong for increasing live connect rates for sdr outbound calling, while Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Orum and Tana compare on price?
Orum is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Orum and Tana?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.