OpenOats and Wave are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. OpenOats: Open-source macOS meeting note-taker that transcribes calls locally and surfaces relevant talking points from your own notes in real time. Wave: Cross-platform AI note taker that records and transcribes meetings, calls, and voice memos into summaries. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist OpenOats when getting live, context-aware prompts from your own notes during sales or customer calls matters most, and Wave when recording browser-based meetings without a bot joining matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source macOS meeting note-taker that transcribes calls locally and surfaces relevant talking points from your own notes in real time.
Cross-platform AI note taker that records and transcribes meetings, calls, and voice memos into summaries.
OpenOats is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Wave is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | OpenOats | Wave |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Real-time local transcription of both sides of a conversation on Apple Silicon | Records meetings, calls, lectures, and voice memos |
| Standout feature | Live retrieval of relevant talking points from your own notes during meetings | Bot-free tab audio capture plus combined tab and mic mode |
| Team usage | Window hidden from screen sharing by default for privacy on calls | Speaker-labeled transcripts with summaries and action items |
| Integrations | Auto-saved transcripts and session logs to local files | Apps for iOS, Android, web, Mac, Windows, and Chrome |
| Languages & capture | Works fully local via Ollama or with cloud models (OpenRouter, Voyage AI) | Support for dozens of languages |
| Best-fit workflow | MIT-licensed, self-hostable Swift application | Encrypted cloud storage with no model training on user data |
OpenOats
Choose OpenOats if you need getting live, context-aware prompts from your own notes during sales or customer calls — strengths include local on-device transcription keeps meeting audio private.
Wave
Choose Wave if you need recording browser-based meetings without a bot joining — strengths include bot-free capture across many platforms and devices.
OpenOats
Wave
It depends on your workflow. OpenOats is strong for getting live, context-aware prompts from your own notes during sales or customer calls, while Wave is strong for recording browser-based meetings without a bot joining. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
OpenOats is a free tier with paid upgrades and Wave is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.