OpenOats and Tiro are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. OpenOats: Open-source macOS meeting note-taker that transcribes calls locally and surfaces relevant talking points from your own notes in real time. Tiro: Real-time AI meeting note-taker from Plato, strong in Korean and Japanese, with fast transcription and translation across many languages. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist OpenOats when getting live, context-aware prompts from your own notes during sales or customer calls matters most, and Tiro when korean and japanese teams needing accurate native-language meeting notes matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source macOS meeting note-taker that transcribes calls locally and surfaces relevant talking points from your own notes in real time.
Real-time AI meeting note-taker from Plato, strong in Korean and Japanese, with fast transcription and translation across many languages.
OpenOats is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tiro is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | OpenOats | Tiro |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Real-time local transcription of both sides of a conversation on Apple Silicon | Real-time transcription with low latency and quick formatted summaries |
| Standout feature | Live retrieval of relevant talking points from your own notes during meetings | Strong Korean and Japanese support plus many other languages |
| Team usage | Window hidden from screen sharing by default for privacy on calls | Real-time translation across multiple languages |
| Integrations | Auto-saved transcripts and session logs to local files | Speaker diarization and one-click note templates |
| Languages & capture | Works fully local via Ollama or with cloud models (OpenRouter, Voyage AI) | AI chat to ask questions about a meeting |
| Best-fit workflow | MIT-licensed, self-hostable Swift application | Web, desktop (Windows/Mac), and mobile (iOS/Android) capture |
OpenOats
Choose OpenOats if you need getting live, context-aware prompts from your own notes during sales or customer calls — strengths include local on-device transcription keeps meeting audio private.
Tiro
Choose Tiro if you need korean and japanese teams needing accurate native-language meeting notes — strengths include optimized for korean and japanese, a gap in many western-built tools.
OpenOats
Tiro
It depends on your workflow. OpenOats is strong for getting live, context-aware prompts from your own notes during sales or customer calls, while Tiro is strong for korean and japanese teams needing accurate native-language meeting notes. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
OpenOats is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tiro is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.