Oliv and Yating are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Oliv: AI sales assistant for revenue teams that handles meeting prep, live transcription, deal intelligence, and post-call follow-up. Yating: Taiwan-built AI speech-to-text app for classes, meetings, and interviews, optimized for Taiwanese-accent Mandarin and Mandarin-English code-switching. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Oliv when giving account executives automated prep and follow-up around sales calls matters most, and Yating when students transcribing lectures and classes in mandarin or mixed mandarin-english matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI sales assistant for revenue teams that handles meeting prep, live transcription, deal intelligence, and post-call follow-up.
AI meeting summaries delivered to Slack, Teams, or emailAutomatic CRM sync and follow-up email draftingDeal intelligence scorecards using MEDDICC, BANT, and SPICED frameworks
Taiwan-built AI speech-to-text app for classes, meetings, and interviews, optimized for Taiwanese-accent Mandarin and Mandarin-English code-switching.
Oliv vs Yating: Pricing, Features & Recommendation | Hosiqo
API access for batch processing and ASRCross-platform: mobile, web, and Chrome pluginLive microphone transcription plus transcription of recorded and uploaded files
Oliv is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Yating is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Live meeting transcription and instant call highlights
Live microphone transcription plus transcription of recorded and uploaded files
Standout feature
Pre-meeting prospect research and AI meeting prep
Optimized for Taiwanese-accent Mandarin and Mandarin-English code-switching
Team usage
Deal intelligence scorecards using MEDDICC, BANT, and SPICED frameworks
Support for Mandarin, Taiwanese, English, Japanese, and Cantonese
Integrations
AI meeting summaries delivered to Slack, Teams, or email
Speaker identification with timestamps
Languages & capture
Automatic CRM sync and follow-up email drafting
Subtitle mode for accessibility
Best-fit workflow
Live meeting transcription and instant call highlights
Cross-platform: mobile, web, and Chrome plugin
Best for
Oliv
Choose Oliv if you need giving account executives automated prep and follow-up around sales calls — strengths include supports the full sales cycle from prep through follow-up.
Yating
Choose Yating if you need students transcribing lectures and classes in mandarin or mixed mandarin-english — strengths include strong handling of taiwanese-accent mandarin and chinese-english code-switching.
Pros & cons
Oliv
+ Supports the full sales cycle from prep through follow-up
+ Captures deal data automatically to reduce manual CRM updates
- Breadth of features can be more than smaller teams need
Yating
+ Strong handling of Taiwanese-accent Mandarin and Chinese-English code-switching
+ Privacy-focused with locally developed models and a no-data-selling stance
- Language strengths are centered on Taiwan-region languages rather than broad global coverage
FAQ
Is Oliv or Yating better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Oliv is strong for giving account executives automated prep and follow-up around sales calls, while Yating is strong for students transcribing lectures and classes in mandarin or mixed mandarin-english. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Oliv and Yating compare on price?
Oliv is a free tier with paid upgrades and Yating is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Oliv and Yating?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.