Oliv and Pluely are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Oliv: AI sales assistant for revenue teams that handles meeting prep, live transcription, deal intelligence, and post-call follow-up. Pluely: A lightweight open-source desktop AI meeting assistant that captures system audio for live transcription and on-call answers without joining as a visible bot. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Oliv when giving account executives automated prep and follow-up around sales calls matters most, and Pluely when getting live transcription and ai assistance during meetings without a visible bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI sales assistant for revenue teams that handles meeting prep, live transcription, deal intelligence, and post-call follow-up.
AI meeting summaries delivered to Slack, Teams, or emailAutomatic CRM sync and follow-up email draftingDeal intelligence scorecards using MEDDICC, BANT, and SPICED frameworks
A lightweight open-source desktop AI meeting assistant that captures system audio for live transcription and on-call answers without joining as a visible bot.
Oliv vs Pluely: Pricing, Features & Recommendation | Hosiqo
Always-on-top overlay app for macOS, Windows, and LinuxBot-free capture of system audio and microphone for live transcriptionBring-your-own-key support for many LLMs (OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Mistral, Cohere, Ollama, custom)
Oliv is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Pluely is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Live meeting transcription and instant call highlights
Bot-free capture of system audio and microphone for live transcription
Standout feature
Pre-meeting prospect research and AI meeting prep
Always-on-top overlay app for macOS, Windows, and Linux
Team usage
Deal intelligence scorecards using MEDDICC, BANT, and SPICED frameworks
Bring-your-own-key support for many LLMs (OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Mistral, Cohere, Ollama, custom)
Integrations
AI meeting summaries delivered to Slack, Teams, or email
Multiple speech-to-text providers (Whisper, Deepgram, ElevenLabs, Groq, Azure, and others)
Languages & capture
Automatic CRM sync and follow-up email drafting
Lightweight (~10MB) and fast to launch
Best-fit workflow
Live meeting transcription and instant call highlights
Open source under GPL with optional local processing via Ollama
Best for
Oliv
Choose Oliv if you need giving account executives automated prep and follow-up around sales calls — strengths include supports the full sales cycle from prep through follow-up.
Pluely
Choose Pluely if you need getting live transcription and ai assistance during meetings without a visible bot in the call — strengths include free and open source with fully inspectable code.
Pros & cons
Oliv
+ Supports the full sales cycle from prep through follow-up
+ Captures deal data automatically to reduce manual CRM updates
- Breadth of features can be more than smaller teams need
Pluely
+ Free and open source with fully inspectable code
+ Bot-free and can run locally for privacy when paired with local models
- Requires bringing your own API keys, adding setup effort and external usage costs
FAQ
Is Oliv or Pluely better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Oliv is strong for giving account executives automated prep and follow-up around sales calls, while Pluely is strong for getting live transcription and ai assistance during meetings without a visible bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Oliv and Pluely compare on price?
Oliv is a free tier with paid upgrades and Pluely is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Oliv and Pluely?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.