Nyota and OpenTranscribe are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Nyota: AI meeting assistant for managers that transcribes calls, generates template-based summaries and action items, and tracks projects and people. OpenTranscribe: Self-hosted, containerized web app for transcribing and analyzing audio/video with WhisperX, speaker diarization, search, and collaboration. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Nyota when engineering and team leaders documenting one-on-ones and syncs matters most, and OpenTranscribe when teams self-hosting a searchable archive of transcribed meeting and media recordings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI meeting assistant for managers that transcribes calls, generates template-based summaries and action items, and tracks projects and people.
Self-hosted, containerized web app for transcribing and analyzing audio/video with WhisperX, speaker diarization, search, and collaboration.
Nyota is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); OpenTranscribe is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Nyota | OpenTranscribe |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Joins and transcribes Zoom, Google Meet and Microsoft Teams calls | WhisperX transcription with large-v3-turbo and 100+ language support |
| Standout feature | More than 20 meeting templates for tailored summaries | Automatic speaker diarization via PyAnnote v4 with overlap detection |
| Team usage | Automatic action item and key takeaway extraction | Full-text search and filtering powered by OpenSearch |
| Integrations | Searchable archive of past conversations | AI summarization, topic extraction, and content analysis via multiple LLM providers |
| Languages & capture | Agenda preparation and signal tracking across meetings | Time-stamped comments for collaboration and annotation |
| Best-fit workflow | Sharing to Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Notion, Google Drive and more | Auto-import from local folders, S3, and SMB shares |
Nyota
Choose Nyota if you need engineering and team leaders documenting one-on-ones and syncs — strengths include template variety tailors summaries to different meeting types.
OpenTranscribe
Choose OpenTranscribe if you need teams self-hosting a searchable archive of transcribed meeting and media recordings — strengths include fully self-hosted web app with a complete transcription-and-analysis stack.
Nyota
OpenTranscribe
It depends on your workflow. Nyota is strong for engineering and team leaders documenting one-on-ones and syncs, while OpenTranscribe is strong for teams self-hosting a searchable archive of transcribed meeting and media recordings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Nyota is a free tier with paid upgrades and OpenTranscribe is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.