Nyota and meetXcc are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Nyota: AI meeting assistant for managers that transcribes calls, generates template-based summaries and action items, and tracks projects and people. meetXcc: Bot-free Chrome extension that joins Google Meet invisibly, transcribes in many languages, and turns conversations into structured notes, mind maps, and action items. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Nyota when engineering and team leaders documenting one-on-ones and syncs matters most, and meetXcc when google meet users who want bot-free capture without an extra participant matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI meeting assistant for managers that transcribes calls, generates template-based summaries and action items, and tracks projects and people.
Bot-free Chrome extension that joins Google Meet invisibly, transcribes in many languages, and turns conversations into structured notes, mind maps, and action items.
Nyota is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); meetXcc is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Nyota | meetXcc |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Joins and transcribes Zoom, Google Meet and Microsoft Teams calls | Bot-free, invisible capture inside Google Meet |
| Standout feature | More than 20 meeting templates for tailored summaries | Real-time transcription across many languages |
| Team usage | Automatic action item and key takeaway extraction | AI summaries organized by people, topics, and timeline |
| Integrations | Searchable archive of past conversations | Mind map generation from meeting content |
| Languages & capture | Agenda preparation and signal tracking across meetings | Action item and highlight extraction with inline note-taking |
| Best-fit workflow | Sharing to Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Notion, Google Drive and more | One-click export, email, and cloud storage sync |
Nyota
Choose Nyota if you need engineering and team leaders documenting one-on-ones and syncs — strengths include template variety tailors summaries to different meeting types.
meetXcc
Choose meetXcc if you need google meet users who want bot-free capture without an extra participant — strengths include invisible, bot-free capture avoids adding a participant to the call.
Nyota
meetXcc
It depends on your workflow. Nyota is strong for engineering and team leaders documenting one-on-ones and syncs, while meetXcc is strong for google meet users who want bot-free capture without an extra participant. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Nyota is a free tier with paid upgrades and meetXcc is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.