Notulin.id and Skribby are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Notulin.id: Indonesian AI meeting tool with an Indonesia-first ASR model that records calls, transcribes, and produces summaries, decision lists, and action items. Skribby: Developer-focused meeting bot API by Skribe VOF that deploys recording and transcription bots to Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet with bring-your-own-key transcription. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Notulin.id when indonesian companies needing accurate bahasa indonesia meeting minutes matters most, and Skribby when adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Indonesian AI meeting tool with an Indonesia-first ASR model that records calls, transcribes, and produces summaries, decision lists, and action items.
Automatic summaries with decision lists and action itemsBahasa Indonesia language focusGoogle and Outlook calendar integration for automatic capture
Developer-focused meeting bot API by Skribe VOF that deploys recording and transcription bots to Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet with bring-your-own-key transcription.
Notulin.id vs Skribby: Pricing, Features & Recommendation | Hosiqo
Bot authentication for joining restricted meetingsBring-your-own-key support for 10+ transcription providers (Deepgram, Whisper, AssemblyAI, Soniox, ElevenLabs)Meeting bots that join and record Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet
Notulin.id is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Skribby is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Indonesia-first ASR model tuned for local terms, names, and abbreviations
Meeting bots that join and record Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet
Standout feature
Recording and transcription for Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams
Real-time transcription over WebSocket plus asynchronous transcripts
Team usage
Google and Outlook calendar integration for automatic capture
Bring-your-own-key support for 10+ transcription providers (Deepgram, Whisper, AssemblyAI, Soniox, ElevenLabs)
Integrations
Multi-speaker detection
Webhook notifications for transcripts and bot events
Languages & capture
Automatic summaries with decision lists and action items
Speaker identification (diarization) and 30+ language support
Best-fit workflow
Bahasa Indonesia language focus
Bot authentication for joining restricted meetings
Best for
Notulin.id
Choose Notulin.id if you need indonesian companies needing accurate bahasa indonesia meeting minutes — strengths include locally trained asr aimed at higher accuracy for indonesian meetings.
Skribby
Choose Skribby if you need adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api — strengths include pay-as-you-go api with no monthly minimums or contracts.
Pros & cons
Notulin.id
+ Locally trained ASR aimed at higher accuracy for Indonesian meetings
- Built for the Indonesian market and Bahasa Indonesia
Skribby
+ Pay-as-you-go API with no monthly minimums or contracts
+ Provider-agnostic transcription via bring-your-own-key across many engines
- Cloud-only managed service with no self-hosting or open-source option
FAQ
Is Notulin.id or Skribby better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Notulin.id is strong for indonesian companies needing accurate bahasa indonesia meeting minutes, while Skribby is strong for adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Notulin.id and Skribby compare on price?
Notulin.id is a free tier with paid upgrades and Skribby is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Notulin.id and Skribby?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.