Notta and Zocks are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. Zocks: Privacy-first AI assistant for financial advisors that automates client meeting notes, follow-ups, forms, and CRM updates. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most, and Zocks when documenting client review and discovery meetings for compliance and records matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium); Zocks is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
AI note-taking with speaker attribution for client meetings
Standout feature
AI summaries
Live meeting analysis during calls
Team usage
File upload transcription
Automatic form filling for intake, fact-finder, and account-opening documents
Integrations
CRM integrations
CRM auto-sync with Wealthbox, Redtail, Salesforce, HubSpot, and eMoney
Languages & capture
58-language transcription
AI-drafted follow-up and client response emails
Best-fit workflow
AI summaries
Pre-meeting preparation with agendas and client profiles
Best for
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
Zocks
Choose Zocks if you need documenting client review and discovery meetings for compliance and records — strengths include purpose-built for financial advisors rather than a generic notetaker.
Pros & cons
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
Zocks
+ Purpose-built for financial advisors rather than a generic notetaker
+ Privacy-oriented design that does not retain meeting audio or video
- Focused on financial services, so less suited to other professions
FAQ
Is Notta or Zocks better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription, while Zocks is strong for documenting client review and discovery meetings for compliance and records. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Notta and Zocks compare on price?
Notta is from $8.17/mo and Zocks is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Notta and Zocks?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.