Notta and ZMEETING are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. ZMEETING: AI meeting-minutes service by Hmcomm that automatically transcribes Zoom and Microsoft Teams meetings, identifies speakers, and supports multilingual transcription. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most, and ZMEETING when automatically generating minutes for zoom or teams calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI meeting-minutes service by Hmcomm that automatically transcribes Zoom and Microsoft Teams meetings, identifies speakers, and supports multilingual transcription.
Automatic filler-word removalAutomatic transcription of Zoom and Microsoft Teams meetings
Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium); ZMEETING is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Automatic transcription of Zoom and Microsoft Teams meetings
Standout feature
AI summaries
Speaker identification on higher-tier plans
Team usage
File upload transcription
Multilingual transcription and translation (Japanese, English, and more)
Integrations
CRM integrations
Custom dictionary for specialized terminology
Languages & capture
58-language transcription
Automatic filler-word removal
Best-fit workflow
AI summaries
Emotion recognition and meeting-atmosphere analysis on upper tiers
Best for
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
ZMEETING
Choose ZMEETING if you need automatically generating minutes for zoom or teams calls — strengths include proprietary speech-recognition technology from a research-derived vendor.
Pros & cons
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
ZMEETING
+ Proprietary speech-recognition technology from a research-derived vendor
+ Licensing by simultaneous meetings supports unlimited users for org-wide rollout
- Advanced features such as speaker ID and emotion analysis are limited to higher-tier plans
FAQ
Is Notta or ZMEETING better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription, while ZMEETING is strong for automatically generating minutes for zoom or teams calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Notta and ZMEETING compare on price?
Notta is from $8.17/mo and ZMEETING is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Notta and ZMEETING?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.
Notta vs ZMEETING: Pricing, Features & Recommendation | Hosiqo