Notta and Zell are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. Zell: Berlin-based sales performance intelligence platform that analyzes real sales calls, surfaces skill gaps, and delivers AI coaching and roleplays, using GDPR-compliant on-device transcription. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most, and Zell when analyzing real sales calls to score rep behaviors and identify skill gaps matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Berlin-based sales performance intelligence platform that analyzes real sales calls, surfaces skill gaps, and delivers AI coaching and roleplays, using GDPR-compliant on-device transcription.
AI coaching, personalized coaching plans, and roleplay simulations
Automated scorecards on talk patterns, objection handling, and discovery depth
Captures and analyzes video, phone, and in-person sales calls
Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium); Zell is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Captures and analyzes video, phone, and in-person sales calls
Standout feature
AI summaries
GDPR-compliant on-device transcription without a meeting bot or stored customer data
Team usage
File upload transcription
Automated scorecards on talk patterns, objection handling, and discovery depth
Integrations
CRM integrations
Instant AI call summaries after each conversation
Languages & capture
58-language transcription
Skill-gap dashboard for managers across reps
Best-fit workflow
AI summaries
AI coaching, personalized coaching plans, and roleplay simulations
Best for
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
Zell
Choose Zell if you need analyzing real sales calls to score rep behaviors and identify skill gaps — strengths include privacy-first design with on-device transcription suited to gdpr-conscious eu teams.
Pros & cons
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
Zell
+ Privacy-first design with on-device transcription suited to GDPR-conscious EU teams
+ Works for in-person meetings as well as video and phone calls
- Early-stage company (founded 2024) with limited public track record and small funding to date
FAQ
Is Notta or Zell better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription, while Zell is strong for analyzing real sales calls to score rep behaviors and identify skill gaps. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Notta and Zell compare on price?
Notta is from $8.17/mo and Zell is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Notta and Zell?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.
Notta vs Zell: Pricing, Features & Recommendation | Hosiqo