Notta and Vexa are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. Vexa: API-first, open-source meeting transcription platform that deploys bots to capture real-time, speaker-labeled transcripts for developers. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most, and Vexa when building custom meeting-intelligence features into a product matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium); Vexa is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
API-first design with REST and WebSocket interfaces
Standout feature
AI summaries
Real-time, speaker-diarized transcription with low latency
Team usage
File upload transcription
Deployable bots that join meetings via URL to capture audio
Integrations
CRM integrations
Open-source (Apache 2.0) with self-hosted or managed cloud options
Languages & capture
58-language transcription
Data storage with query and export capabilities
Best-fit workflow
AI summaries
Supports Google Meet and Microsoft Teams (Zoom planned)
Best for
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
Vexa
Choose Vexa if you need building custom meeting-intelligence features into a product — strengths include programmable infrastructure for embedding meeting transcription into products.
Pros & cons
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
Vexa
+ Programmable infrastructure for embedding meeting transcription into products
+ Open-source and self-hostable for control over data and deployment
- Developer-oriented rather than a ready-to-use end-user notetaking app
FAQ
Is Notta or Vexa better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription, while Vexa is strong for building custom meeting-intelligence features into a product. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Notta and Vexa compare on price?
Notta is from $8.17/mo and Vexa is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Notta and Vexa?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.