Notta and Typist are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. Typist: AI speech-to-text service that converts audio and video into text and exports captions, with tiered models for speed or accuracy. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most, and Typist when transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium); Typist is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Audio and video to text transcription across many file formats
Standout feature
AI summaries
Export to SRT subtitles, WebVTT captions, DOCX, PDF, and TXT
Team usage
File upload transcription
Multiple transcription models trading off speed and accuracy
Integrations
CRM integrations
Speaker identification on the highest-accuracy tier
Languages & capture
58-language transcription
Word-level and segment-level timestamps for clean subtitle timing
Best-fit workflow
AI summaries
Support for a wide range of languages and accents
Best for
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
Typist
Choose Typist if you need transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls — strengths include clean subtitle exports (srt and webvtt) that import into video editors.
Pros & cons
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
Typist
+ Clean subtitle exports (SRT and WebVTT) that import into video editors
+ Choice of models lets users prioritize speed or accuracy per job
- Speaker identification is limited to the top tier
FAQ
Is Notta or Typist better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription, while Typist is strong for transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Notta and Typist compare on price?
Notta is from $8.17/mo and Typist is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Notta and Typist?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.