Notta and Trellus are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. Trellus: Real-time AI sales coaching and parallel dialer delivered as a lightweight Chrome extension that layers onto existing sales tools. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most, and Trellus when coaching reps in real time during outbound calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium); Trellus is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Real-time, in-call AI coaching and adaptive guidance
Standout feature
AI summaries
Parallel dialer with multiple simultaneous lines
Team usage
File upload transcription
Automated voicemail drops and number-health monitoring
Integrations
CRM integrations
AI voice agents for practice roleplay and inbound qualification
Languages & capture
58-language transcription
Call analytics and performance scoring
Best-fit workflow
AI summaries
Chrome extension that layers onto Salesloft, Outreach, and HubSpot
Best for
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
Trellus
Choose Trellus if you need coaching reps in real time during outbound calls — strengths include adds live coaching and dialing without replacing existing tools.
Pros & cons
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
Trellus
+ Adds live coaching and dialing without replacing existing tools
+ Lightweight browser-extension deployment
- Focused on outbound calling rather than full meeting capture
FAQ
Is Notta or Trellus better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription, while Trellus is strong for coaching reps in real time during outbound calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Notta and Trellus compare on price?
Notta is from $8.17/mo and Trellus is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Notta and Trellus?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.