Notta and toruno are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. toruno: Ricoh's Japanese meeting recording service combining transcription, audio recording, and screen capture for online and in-person meetings. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most, and toruno when japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium); toruno is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Combined transcription, audio recording, and screen capture of meetings
Standout feature
AI summaries
Real-time transcription via Windows desktop app, plus iPhone and file-upload capture
Team usage
File upload transcription
AI-generated summaries with customizable minutes templates
Integrations
CRM integrations
Japanese-first transcription with English and Chinese support on higher plans
Languages & capture
58-language transcription
Enterprise security: two-factor authentication and IP restrictions
Best-fit workflow
AI summaries
Per-user permission management over transcriptions
Best for
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
toruno
Choose toruno if you need japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations — strengths include screen capture alongside transcript preserves visual context from meetings.
Pros & cons
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
toruno
+ Screen capture alongside transcript preserves visual context from meetings
+ Backed by Ricoh with enterprise security and administration controls
- Real-time transcription is tied to the Windows desktop app
FAQ
Is Notta or toruno better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription, while toruno is strong for japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Notta and toruno compare on price?
Notta is from $8.17/mo and toruno is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Notta and toruno?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.