Notta and Tiro are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. Tiro: Real-time AI meeting note-taker from Plato, strong in Korean and Japanese, with fast transcription and translation across many languages. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most, and Tiro when korean and japanese teams needing accurate native-language meeting notes matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium); Tiro is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Real-time transcription with low latency and quick formatted summaries
Standout feature
AI summaries
Strong Korean and Japanese support plus many other languages
Team usage
File upload transcription
Real-time translation across multiple languages
Integrations
CRM integrations
Speaker diarization and one-click note templates
Languages & capture
58-language transcription
AI chat to ask questions about a meeting
Best-fit workflow
AI summaries
Web, desktop (Windows/Mac), and mobile (iOS/Android) capture
Best for
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
Tiro
Choose Tiro if you need korean and japanese teams needing accurate native-language meeting notes — strengths include optimized for korean and japanese, a gap in many western-built tools.
Pros & cons
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
Tiro
+ Optimized for Korean and Japanese, a gap in many Western-built tools
+ Fast real-time transcription and translation for cross-border meetings
- Freemium model caps monthly transcription minutes on lower tiers
FAQ
Is Notta or Tiro better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription, while Tiro is strong for korean and japanese teams needing accurate native-language meeting notes. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Notta and Tiro compare on price?
Notta is from $8.17/mo and Tiro is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Notta and Tiro?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.