Notta and Thoth are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. Thoth: Privacy-first macOS app that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings entirely on-device with no cloud or data leaving the Mac. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most, and Thoth when professionals handling confidential or regulated information matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium); Thoth is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
100% local, on-device recording, transcription, and summarization
Standout feature
AI summaries
Dual-channel capture of microphone and system audio
Team usage
File upload transcription
On-device speaker detection with color-coded transcripts
Integrations
CRM integrations
Whisper-based transcription supporting many languages
Languages & capture
58-language transcription
On-device anonymization to redact sensitive content
Best-fit workflow
AI summaries
Export to PDF, Word, Markdown, and timestamped JSON
Best for
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
Thoth
Choose Thoth if you need professionals handling confidential or regulated information — strengths include fully local processing with no cloud requirement and no user database.
Pros & cons
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
Thoth
+ Fully local processing with no cloud requirement and no user database
+ Captures both sides of online meetings and works offline
- Requires a Mac with Apple Silicon and sufficient unified memory
FAQ
Is Notta or Thoth better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription, while Thoth is strong for professionals handling confidential or regulated information. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Notta and Thoth compare on price?
Notta is from $8.17/mo and Thoth is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Notta and Thoth?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.