Notta and TeamRetro are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. TeamRetro: Purpose-built online tool for running agile retrospectives, team health checks, and planning poker with AI-assisted idea grouping and summaries. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most, and TeamRetro when running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium); TeamRetro is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Guided retrospective workflow with anonymous input, grouping, and dot voting
Standout feature
AI summaries
AI-assisted automatic grouping of similar ideas into themes
Team usage
File upload transcription
AI-generated retrospective summaries (when enabled by the organization)
Integrations
CRM integrations
Recurring team health checks with trend and sentiment tracking over time
Languages & capture
58-language transcription
Large library of retrospective templates and icebreaker activities
Best-fit workflow
AI summaries
Action-item tracking carried across sessions
Best for
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
TeamRetro
Choose TeamRetro if you need running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams — strengths include purpose-built for retrospectives rather than a repurposed generic whiteboard.
Pros & cons
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
TeamRetro
+ Purpose-built for retrospectives rather than a repurposed generic whiteboard
+ AI grouping and summaries reduce facilitation overhead during retros
- Focused on agile retrospectives and team health, so it is narrower than a general meeting assistant
FAQ
Is Notta or TeamRetro better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription, while TeamRetro is strong for running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Notta and TeamRetro compare on price?
Notta is from $8.17/mo and TeamRetro is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Notta and TeamRetro?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.