Notta and Summarize by Moodbit are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. Summarize by Moodbit: A Microsoft Teams app from Moodbit, available on the Teams app store / Microsoft AppSource, that turns Teams meeting transcriptions into AI summaries, action items and sentiment analysis. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most, and Summarize by Moodbit when automatically summarizing microsoft teams meetings into the chat matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A Microsoft Teams app from Moodbit, available on the Teams app store / Microsoft AppSource, that turns Teams meeting transcriptions into AI summaries, action items and sentiment analysis.
AI-generated meeting summaries posted to the Teams chat
Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium); Summarize by Moodbit is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Distributed through the Microsoft Teams app store / Microsoft AppSource
Standout feature
AI summaries
Turns real-time Microsoft Teams transcriptions into meeting notes
Team usage
File upload transcription
AI-generated meeting summaries posted to the Teams chat
Integrations
CRM integrations
Automated action-item and task recommendations
Languages & capture
58-language transcription
AI-powered sentiment analysis of meeting tone
Best-fit workflow
AI summaries
Native Teams add-on with no separate software to install
Best for
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
Summarize by Moodbit
Choose Summarize by Moodbit if you need automatically summarizing microsoft teams meetings into the chat — strengths include installs natively from the microsoft teams store with minimal setup.
Pros & cons
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
Summarize by Moodbit
+ Installs natively from the Microsoft Teams store with minimal setup
+ Posts summaries and action items directly into the meeting chat
- Focused specifically on Microsoft Teams rather than multi-platform
FAQ
Is Notta or Summarize by Moodbit better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription, while Summarize by Moodbit is strong for automatically summarizing microsoft teams meetings into the chat. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Notta and Summarize by Moodbit compare on price?
Notta is from $8.17/mo and Summarize by Moodbit is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Notta and Summarize by Moodbit?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.
Notta vs Summarize by Moodbit: Pricing, Features & Recommendation | Hosiqo