Notta and Subanana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Notta: High-accuracy transcription with 42+ language translation Subanana: Hong Kong AI transcription and subtitling platform with meeting transcription, summaries, and multilingual support. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most, and Subanana when transcribing and summarizing cantonese-english meetings for hong kong teams matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium); Subanana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
AI transcription and subtitle generation across 80+ languages
Standout feature
AI summaries
Strong handling of mixed Cantonese-and-English (code-switching) audio
Team usage
File upload transcription
Meeting transcription with automated summaries and action items
Integrations
CRM integrations
Real-time voice transcription with live translation
Languages & capture
58-language transcription
Automatic speaker identification
Best-fit workflow
AI summaries
Subtitle embedding and export to .srt, .docx, .csv, and .txt
Best for
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
Subanana
Choose Subanana if you need transcribing and summarizing cantonese-english meetings for hong kong teams — strengths include built for the hong kong market with strong cantonese and code-switching support.
Pros & cons
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
Subanana
+ Built for the Hong Kong market with strong Cantonese and code-switching support
+ Covers both subtitling/content workflows and meeting transcription
- Free allowance is limited before requiring a paid plan
FAQ
Is Notta or Subanana better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription, while Subanana is strong for transcribing and summarizing cantonese-english meetings for hong kong teams. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Notta and Subanana compare on price?
Notta is from $8.17/mo and Subanana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Notta and Subanana?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.