Notta and spf.io are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. spf.io: AI captioning and translation platform for in-person, virtual, and hybrid events, supporting 100+ languages with broad streaming integrations. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most, and spf.io when captioning and translating large in-person conferences across projectors and mobile devices matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium); spf.io is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Automatic live captions and translation in 100+ languages, with translated audio in 70+
Standout feature
AI summaries
Projector display of up to four languages plus mobile QR/URL attendee access
Team usage
File upload transcription
Integrations with Zoom, Teams, Google Meet, YouTube, OBS, StreamYard, vMix, and Twitch
Integrations
CRM integrations
Supervised/edited captioning and bidirectional translation modes
Languages & capture
58-language transcription
Vocabulary fine-tuning, custom speech recognition, and adapted translation models
Best-fit workflow
AI summaries
Optional professional captioners, interpreters, and remote operators as add-ons
Best for
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
spf.io
Choose spf.io if you need captioning and translating large in-person conferences across projectors and mobile devices — strengths include very broad language coverage for both captions and translated audio.
Pros & cons
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
spf.io
+ Very broad language coverage for both captions and translated audio
+ Works across in-person, virtual, and hybrid events with many streaming integrations
- Add-on human services and operators add cost beyond the automated tooling
FAQ
Is Notta or spf.io better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription, while spf.io is strong for captioning and translating large in-person conferences across projectors and mobile devices. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Notta and spf.io compare on price?
Notta is from $8.17/mo and spf.io is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Notta and spf.io?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.